From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Duncan v. State

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Jul 1, 2020
306 So. 3d 339 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

No. 3D18-2587

07-01-2020

Terrance DUNCAN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Daniel J. Tibbitt, P.A., and Daniel Tibbitt, for appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Magaly Rodriguez, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.


Daniel J. Tibbitt, P.A., and Daniel Tibbitt, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Magaly Rodriguez, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SCALES, MILLER, and GORDO, JJ.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Rodriguez v. State, 223 So. 3d 1095, 1097 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) ("The record, which includes the plea colloquy, clearly refutes these claims, and under Florida law, a defendant is bound by the statements he makes under oath during a plea colloquy.") (citations omitted); see also Jackson v. State, 147 So. 3d 469, 482 (Fla. 2014) ("[C]ounsel cannot be deemed ineffective merely because current counsel disagrees with trial counsel's strategic decisions ... [S]trategic decisions do not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel if alternative courses have been considered and rejected and counsel's decision was reasonable under the norms of professional conduct.") (second and third alterations in original) (citation omitted).


Summaries of

Duncan v. State

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Jul 1, 2020
306 So. 3d 339 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Duncan v. State

Case Details

Full title:Terrance Duncan, Appellant, v. The State of Florida, Appellee.

Court:Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Date published: Jul 1, 2020

Citations

306 So. 3d 339 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)