From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Duncan v. Peabody

Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont
Aug 11, 2005
No. 09-05-227 CV (Tex. App. Aug. 11, 2005)

Opinion

No. 09-05-227 CV

Opinion Delivered August 11, 2005.

On Appeal from the 221st District Court, Montgomery County, Texas, Trial Cause No. 04-06-05037 Cv.

Appeal dismissed for Lack of Jurisdiction.

Before McKEITHEN, C.J., KREGER and HORTON, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


On June 23, 2005, we informed the parties that our jurisdiction was not apparent from the notice of appeal, and notified them that the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction unless we received a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. The appellant did not file a response.

The notice of appeal seeks to appeal "the denial of citation" in a petition for removal of an Assistant District Attorney. No appealable order has been signed by the trial court. See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

It appears the appellant may have filed a petition to remove an assistant district attorney as one might petition to remove an elected county officer. The order signed by the trial court does not dismiss the case. We note, however, that no appeal may be taken from a dismissal of a petition to remove the elected district attorney where the trial court refused to issue citation. See Tex. Loc. Gov't Code Ann. § 87.016 (Vernon 1999).


Summaries of

Duncan v. Peabody

Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont
Aug 11, 2005
No. 09-05-227 CV (Tex. App. Aug. 11, 2005)
Case details for

Duncan v. Peabody

Case Details

Full title:RONALD EDWIN DUNCAN, Appellant v. BRETT PEABODY, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont

Date published: Aug 11, 2005

Citations

No. 09-05-227 CV (Tex. App. Aug. 11, 2005)