From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Duncan v. Hurcland

United States District Court, M.D. Georgia
Nov 15, 2011
NO. 5:10-CV-390 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Nov. 15, 2011)

Opinion

NO. 5:10-CV-390 (HL).

November 15, 2011.


ORDER


Plaintiff HUBERT LEE DUNCAN, an inmate at Coastal State Prison, has filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal (Doc. 52) from the Court’s Order (Doc. 48) accepting United States Magistrate Judge Charles H. Weigle’s recommendation (Doc. 42) that Defendants’ motion to dismiss be granted. In the Court’s best judgment, the appeal is frivolous and not taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). Accordingly, having been carefully considered, Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is hereby DENIED.

If Plaintiff wishes to proceed with his appeal, he must pay the entire $455 appellate filing fee. Because Plaintiff has stated that he cannot pay the fee immediately, he must pay using the partial payment plan described under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b). Pursuant to section1915(b), the prison account custodian shall cause to be remitted to the Clerk of this Court monthly payments of 20% of the preceding month’s income credited to Plaintiff’s account (to the extent the account balance exceeds $10) until the $455 appellate filing fee has been paid in full. Checks should be made payable to “Clerk, U.S. District Court.”

The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to send a copy of this Order to the business manager at Coastal State Prison. SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Duncan v. Hurcland

United States District Court, M.D. Georgia
Nov 15, 2011
NO. 5:10-CV-390 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Nov. 15, 2011)
Case details for

Duncan v. Hurcland

Case Details

Full title:DUNCAN v. HURCLAND

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Georgia

Date published: Nov 15, 2011

Citations

NO. 5:10-CV-390 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Nov. 15, 2011)