From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Duncan v. City of N.Y.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Nov 23, 2016
144 A.D.3d 1030 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

11-23-2016

In the Matter of Rodney DUNCAN, also known as Rodney King, respondent, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, appellant.

Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York, N.Y. (Pamela Seider Dolgow and Victoria Scalzo of counsel), for appellant. James Greenberg, P.C. (Burns & Harris, New York, N.Y. [Blake G. Goldfarb, Alison R. Keenan, and Judith F. Stempler ], of counsel), for respondent.


Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York, N.Y. (Pamela Seider Dolgow and Victoria Scalzo of counsel), for appellant.James Greenberg, P.C. (Burns & Harris, New York, N.Y. [Blake G. Goldfarb, Alison R. Keenan, and Judith F. Stempler ], of counsel), for respondent.

In a proceeding pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50–e(5) for leave to serve a late notice of claim, the City of New York appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Baynes, J.), dated October 15, 2014, which granted the petition.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Under the particular facts of this case, the Supreme Court properly granted the instant petition.

ENG, P.J., AUSTIN, ROMAN and COHEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Duncan v. City of N.Y.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Nov 23, 2016
144 A.D.3d 1030 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

Duncan v. City of N.Y.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Rodney DUNCAN, also known as Rodney King, respondent, v…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 23, 2016

Citations

144 A.D.3d 1030 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
144 A.D.3d 1030
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 7955