Opinion
1:20-cv-01288-AWI-SKO (PC)
01-11-2023
DIONTAE JOHAN DUNCAN, Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA HEALTHCARE RECEIVERSHIP CORP., et al., Defendants.
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S TENTH AND ELEVENTH MOTIONS FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER (DOC. NO. 68)
Plaintiff Diontae Johan Duncan is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action. This matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On November 30, 2022, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending that Plaintiff's tenth and eleventh motions (Doc. Nos. 65 & 67) for temporary restraining order be denied. (See Doc. No. 68.) Plaintiff did not file objections.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis. // //
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations issued on November 30, 2022 (Doc. No. 68) are ADOPTED in full;
2. Plaintiff's tenth motion for temporary restraining order (Doc. No. 65) is DENIED; and
3. Plaintiff's eleventh motion for temporary restraining order (Doc. No. 67) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.