From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Duncan v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Eastern Division
Jan 8, 2008
No. 4:06-CV-230-FL (E.D.N.C. Jan. 8, 2008)

Summary

noting that migraine headaches are a condition that cannot be diagnosed or confirmed through laboratory or diagnostic testing and listing cases holding same

Summary of this case from Snyder v. O'Malley

Opinion

No. 4:06-CV-230-FL.

January 8, 2008


ORDER


This matter is before the court on the Memorandum and Recommendation ("M R") of United States Magistrate Judge David W. Daniel, regarding the parties' cross-motions for judgment on the pleadings. No objections to the M R have been filed, and the time within which to make any objection has expired. This matter is ripe for ruling.

The court hereby ADOPTS the recommendation of Magistrate Judge David W. Daniel as its own, and, for the reasons stated therein, plaintiff's motion is GRANTED, defendant's motion is DENIED, and this matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner for rehearing consistent with the M R. The clerk of court is directed to close the case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Duncan v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Eastern Division
Jan 8, 2008
No. 4:06-CV-230-FL (E.D.N.C. Jan. 8, 2008)

noting that migraine headaches are a condition that cannot be diagnosed or confirmed through laboratory or diagnostic testing and listing cases holding same

Summary of this case from Snyder v. O'Malley

noting that migraine headaches are a condition that cannot be diagnosed or confirmed through laboratory or diagnostic testing and listing cases holding same

Summary of this case from Howard v. Kijakazi

noting that headaches are a condition that cannot be diagnosed or confirmed through laboratory or diagnostic testing and listing cases holding same

Summary of this case from Wood v. Colvin

noting that migraine headaches are a condition that cannot be diagnosed or confirmed through laboratory or diagnostic testing and listing cases holding same

Summary of this case from Robinson v. Colvin

noting that migraine headaches are a condition that cannot be diagnosed or confirmed through laboratory or diagnostic testing

Summary of this case from Cramer v. Colvin
Case details for

Duncan v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:GERALD DUNCAN, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Eastern Division

Date published: Jan 8, 2008

Citations

No. 4:06-CV-230-FL (E.D.N.C. Jan. 8, 2008)

Citing Cases

Wood v. Colvin

However, evidence of migraines and other headaches does not normally or necessarily appear on standard…

Wagner v. Berryhill

As the court summarized in Shaw and Jones, migraine headaches cannot be diagnosed or confirmed through…