From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dunbar v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jan 29, 1992
592 So. 2d 1230 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

No. 91-02118.

January 29, 1992.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Lee County, William J. Nelson, J.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Cynthia J. Dodge, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Davis G. Anderson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


We reverse defendant's convictions and sentences for trafficking in cocaine and possession of cannabis. We agree with his contention that the trial court erred in denying defendant's motion to suppress the drugs found in defendant's automobile by officers after the automobile was stopped. The search was conducted during an illegal detention.

The stop occurred because defendant's automobile was making a noise. The officer asked defendant about the noise, and, after checking the defendant's license and registration, found them to be in order and returned them to defendant. No citation was issued. The officer then told defendant he was free to go and wished him luck on his journey. In fact, the officer agreed with defense counsel that when the officer handed the documents back to the defendant, he was "done with [his] business" relating to the initial stop, he was "satisfied that there was . . . nothing wrong with the vehicle that necessitated it remaining at the scene . . .", and that "it was safe for [the defendant] to go ahead and leave in the vehicle."

Thereafter, the officer called to the defendant, who had started to return to the automobile, and requested permission to conduct a search of the automobile. The officer stated that if defendant refused, a drug-sniffing dog would be used.

Notwithstanding the "request" the defendant was obviously detained because he was not free to go. The officer had no articulable evidence of criminal activity to justify the detention of defendant after the officer had been satisfied that no traffic violation had occurred and that defendant's documents were in order. The continued detention of defendant thereafter was illegal, thus rendering illegal the search. See Joseph v. State, 588 So.2d 1014 (Fla.2d DCA Oct. 11, 1991). See also Cresswell v. State, 564 So.2d 480 (Fla. 1990).

The convictions are reversed. Defendant shall be discharged.

FRANK and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Dunbar v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jan 29, 1992
592 So. 2d 1230 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

Dunbar v. State

Case Details

Full title:BRUCE DUNBAR, F/K/A MICHAEL DUNBAR, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jan 29, 1992

Citations

592 So. 2d 1230 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Citing Cases

Howard v. State

See § 901.151 Fla. Stat. (1993). Any further detention of that defendant would be illegal and would render…

Watts v. State

Although Watts testified that one of the officers jumped in front of him and the other one stood behind him,…