From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dunbar v. Ingraham

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 19, 1949
275 App. Div. 898 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)

Opinion

May 19, 1949.

Present — Taylor, P.J., McCurn, Vaughan, Kimball and Piper, JJ.


Order denying motion to vacate the order granting the mistrial modified on the law in accordance with the memorandum and as modified affirmed, without costs of this appeal to any party. Appeal from order directing a mistrial dismissed. Memorandum: This appeal is from the order denying the motion to vacate the order granting the mistrial. (See Fine v. Cummins, 260 App. Div. 569, and Matter of Taylor, 271 App. Div. 947.) It was within the discretion of the trial court to order the withdrawal of a juror and a mistrial, but that part of the order awarding $100 costs to the plaintiff to be paid by the defendant before proceeding further to defend the action, is unauthorized. Costs upon trial of an action are regulated by statute and not otherwise. (See Modern Silk Co. v. Weinstein, 100 Misc. 358; Finck v. Stachelberg, 86 N.Y.S. 20, 21; Browning v. Brokaw, 114 App. Div. 104.) The order appealed from should be modified so as to provide that the provision of the order of mistrial awarding $100 costs to the plaintiff should be stricken therefrom All concur. (One order directs a mistrial in an automobile negligence action; one order denies defendants' motion to vacate the order granting a mistrial.)


Summaries of

Dunbar v. Ingraham

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 19, 1949
275 App. Div. 898 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)
Case details for

Dunbar v. Ingraham

Case Details

Full title:JANNA DUNBAR, Respondent, v. JAMES W. INGRAHAM et al., Appellants…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 19, 1949

Citations

275 App. Div. 898 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)

Citing Cases

Slotkin v. Citizens Cas. Co. of New York

Indeed, because appellees' entire $200,000 would have to be expended before the $1,000,000 in umbrella…

Landberg v. Fowler

Appeal from City Court of the City of White Plains. The order was within the discretion of the trial court…