From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dunavent v. Dunavent

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Dec 7, 2022
351 So. 3d 40 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

No. 4D21-2790

12-07-2022

Scott D. DUNAVENT, Appellant, v. Shannon Lavida DUNAVENT, Appellee.

Elaine L. Thompson, Brandon, and Ama N. Appiah of Law Office of Ama N. Appiah, P.A., St. Petersburg, for appellant. Jonathan S. Root and Christopher A. Tiso of Jonathan S. Root, P.A., Boca Raton, for appellee.


Elaine L. Thompson, Brandon, and Ama N. Appiah of Law Office of Ama N. Appiah, P.A., St. Petersburg, for appellant.

Jonathan S. Root and Christopher A. Tiso of Jonathan S. Root, P.A., Boca Raton, for appellee.

Per Curiam. Affirmed . See Esaw v. Esaw , 965 So. 2d 1261, 1264 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) ("The most salient impediment to meaningful review of the trial court's decision is not the absence of findings, but the absence of a transcript.").

Gross, May and Forst, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Dunavent v. Dunavent

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Dec 7, 2022
351 So. 3d 40 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

Dunavent v. Dunavent

Case Details

Full title:Scott D. DUNAVENT, Appellant, v. Shannon Lavida DUNAVENT, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Date published: Dec 7, 2022

Citations

351 So. 3d 40 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)