From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dumont v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Oct 2, 2015
200 So. 3d 92 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

Opinion

No. 5D15–1981.

10-02-2015

Tye DUMONT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Tye Dumont, Live Oak, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Samuel A. Perrone, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


Tye Dumont, Live Oak, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Samuel A. Perrone, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice to any right Appellant may have to file a facially sufficient rule 3.850 motion. See DeAngelo v. State, 141 So.3d 1269, 1271 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014).

PALMER, COHEN and BERGER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Dumont v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Oct 2, 2015
200 So. 3d 92 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)
Case details for

Dumont v. State

Case Details

Full title:Tye DUMONT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Date published: Oct 2, 2015

Citations

200 So. 3d 92 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)