From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dumbadze v. Agency of Canadian Car Foundry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 30, 1942
263 App. Div. 1018 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)

Opinion

March 30, 1942.


Plaintiff appeals from a resettled order denying his motion to strike out as insufficient in law the defenses numbered "First" to "Ninth" in defendant's amended answer. In his brief plaintiff admits defenses numbered "Second" and "Fourth" are sufficient. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Appeal from the original order dismissed, without costs. No opinion. Lazansky, P.J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Dumbadze v. Agency of Canadian Car Foundry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 30, 1942
263 App. Div. 1018 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)
Case details for

Dumbadze v. Agency of Canadian Car Foundry

Case Details

Full title:VASILY D. DUMBADZE, Appellant, v. AGENCY OF CANADIAN CAR FOUNDRY COMPANY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 30, 1942

Citations

263 App. Div. 1018 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)