Opinion
March 30, 1942.
Plaintiff appeals from a resettled order denying his motion to strike out as insufficient in law the defenses numbered "First" to "Ninth" in defendant's amended answer. In his brief plaintiff admits defenses numbered "Second" and "Fourth" are sufficient. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Appeal from the original order dismissed, without costs. No opinion. Lazansky, P.J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.