From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dumas v. United States

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
May 21, 2018
No. 18-6224 (4th Cir. May. 21, 2018)

Opinion

No. 18-6224

05-21-2018

JOSHUA JACQUIS DUMAS, Petitioner - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent - Appellee.

Joshua Jacquis Dumas, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:18-cv-00175-LMB-MSN) Before KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joshua Jacquis Dumas, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Joshua Jacquis Dumas seeks to appeal the district court's order construing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition as a successive and unauthorized 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion and dismissing it on that basis. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court's assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Dumas has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED


Summaries of

Dumas v. United States

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
May 21, 2018
No. 18-6224 (4th Cir. May. 21, 2018)
Case details for

Dumas v. United States

Case Details

Full title:JOSHUA JACQUIS DUMAS, Petitioner - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: May 21, 2018

Citations

No. 18-6224 (4th Cir. May. 21, 2018)