From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dumais v. Spross

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 12, 1990
163 A.D.2d 725 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

July 12, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (King, J.).


Plaintiffs in this converted declaratory judgment action are the owners of a seasonal campground in the Town of Clinton, Dutchess County, which they have operated since 1971. The campground does not operate during the winter months, but some of the seasonal residents leave their campers connected to the campground's water, sewer and electrical service year round. Plaintiffs contend that this practice has continued uninterrupted for some 20 years.

Trailers and trailer parks in the town, including camping trailers and camping trailer parks, are regulated by Local Laws, 1971, No. 4 of the Town of Clinton (hereinafter Local Law No. 4). By letter dated June 15, 1989, the Town Supervisor advised plaintiffs that Local Law No. 4 required the removal of all camping trailers from the campground for the month of December. Plaintiffs promptly commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to prohibit the town from requiring removal of camping trailers during the month of December. Supreme Court converted the proceeding into a declaratory judgment action, rejected plaintiffs' claims that Local Law No. 4 was not validly enacted and declared that the local law neither required the removal of camping trailers during the month of December nor authorized the town to impose such a requirement. These cross appeals ensued. We affirm.

Because the effect of Supreme Court's judgment is to prohibit the town from proceeding under Local Law No. 4 to require removal of camping trailers from plaintiffs' campground during the month of December, and because that is the relief sought by plaintiffs in this litigation, plaintiffs are not aggrieved by the judgment and cannot appeal (see, CPLR 5511). In any event, there is no merit in plaintiffs' claims that Local Law No. 4 is not a valid enactment.

As to the town's cross appeal, we agree with Supreme Court that Local Law No. 4 contains no express or implied requirement that camping trailers be removed from camping trailer parks during the month of December of each calendar year. It is apparent that, for a substantial period of time, the town interpreted the statute as containing no such requirement. On its face, Local Law No. 4 prohibits only the operation of a camping trailer park during the month of December each calendar year. It contains no prohibition on the storage of camping trailers at camping trailer parks during the period that those parks are not in operation. The local law's definition of camping trailers refers to a vehicle located in a camping trailer park during the months of January through November, but there is nothing in that definition to suggest that a camping trailer cannot be located in a camping trailer park for the month of December as well, so long as there is compliance with the local law's prohibition of the operation of the park during the month of December. Supreme Court's judgment should therefore be affirmed in its entirety.

Judgment affirmed, without costs. Kane, J.P., Casey, Weiss, Mikoll and Harvey, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Dumais v. Spross

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 12, 1990
163 A.D.2d 725 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Dumais v. Spross

Case Details

Full title:RAYMOND H. DUMAIS et al., Appellants-Respondents, v. KATHLEEN M. SPROSS et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jul 12, 1990

Citations

163 A.D.2d 725 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
558 N.Y.S.2d 317

Citing Cases

Porco v. Lifetime Entm't Servs.

Only an aggrieved party is a permissible appellant (see CPLR 5511 ). The aggrievement requirement is…

Dolomite Prods. Co. v. Town of Ballston

In sum, because relief was not granted against respondent and because respondent received its requested…