From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dulnuan v. Sessions

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA MIDDLE DIVISION
Jul 31, 2018
Civil Action Number 4:17-cv-00730-AKK-JHE (N.D. Ala. Jul. 31, 2018)

Opinion

Civil Action Number 4:17-cv-00730-AKK-JHE

07-31-2018

RICHARD DULNUAN, Petitioner, v. JEFF SESSIONS, Attorney General of the United States, Respondent.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

On May 5, 2017 Richard Dulnuan filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 alleging he was being unlawfully detained pending his deportation. Doc. 1. At the time he filed his petition, Dulnuan, a native of the Phillipines, was incarcerated at the Etowah County Detention Center, in the custody of the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement ("ICE"). Id. After an Immigration Judge granted Dulnuan a $3,000 bond in February 2018, Dulnuan posted bond on July 17, 2018, and ICE released him from its custody. See doc. 17-2. As a result, the court finds that this case is due to be dismissed as moot.

Article III of the Constitution limits the jurisdiction of federal courts to the consideration of "cases or controversies." U.S. Const. art. III, § 2. The doctrine of mootness is derived from this limitation because "an action that is moot cannot be characterized as an active case or controversy." Adler v. Duval Cnty. Sch. Bd., 112 F.3d 1475, 1477 (11th Cir. 1997). A case is moot and must be dismissed if the court can no longer provide "meaningful relief." Nyaga v. Ashcroft, 323 F.3d 906, 913 (11th Cir. 2003) (citations omitted).

The relief sought by Dulnuan in his petition is to be released from ICE custody. Where, as here, Dulnuan is no longer in ICE custody, his petition has been rendered moot, unless an exception to the mootness doctrine applies. Because the court concludes that neither of the two exceptions to the mootness doctrine, "collateral consequences" or "capable of repetition yet evading review," see Carafas v. LaVallee, 391 U.S. 234, 237 (1968); Murphy v. Hunt, 455 U.S. 478, 482 (1982), apply here, there is no longer any relief that the court can grant to Dulnuan, and his petition is due to be dismissed as moot.

Based on the foregoing, this case is due to be dismissed as moot. A separate order will be entered.

DONE the 31st day of July, 2018.

/s/_________

ABDUL K. KALLON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Dulnuan v. Sessions

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA MIDDLE DIVISION
Jul 31, 2018
Civil Action Number 4:17-cv-00730-AKK-JHE (N.D. Ala. Jul. 31, 2018)
Case details for

Dulnuan v. Sessions

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD DULNUAN, Petitioner, v. JEFF SESSIONS, Attorney General of the…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA MIDDLE DIVISION

Date published: Jul 31, 2018

Citations

Civil Action Number 4:17-cv-00730-AKK-JHE (N.D. Ala. Jul. 31, 2018)