From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dukes v. Wilson

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Nov 5, 2013
545 F. App'x 227 (4th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 13-6910

11-05-2013

CLARENCE DUKES, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. RICHARD WILSON, Business Manager, Defendant - Appellee.

Clarence Dukes, Appellant Pro Se. Lara Kate Jacobs Todd, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. (7:11-cv-00530-NKM-RSB) Before WILKINSON, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Clarence Dukes, Appellant Pro Se. Lara Kate Jacobs Todd, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Clarence Dukes appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Dukes v. Wilson, No. 7:11-cv-00530-NKM-RSB (W.D. Va. August 28, 2012; May 21, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Dukes v. Wilson

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Nov 5, 2013
545 F. App'x 227 (4th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

Dukes v. Wilson

Case Details

Full title:CLARENCE DUKES, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. RICHARD WILSON, Business…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Nov 5, 2013

Citations

545 F. App'x 227 (4th Cir. 2013)

Citing Cases

Wright v. Ray

Further, [plaintiff] does not show, or even allege, that the unequal treatment was the result of intentional…