From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dukes v. Federal Correctional Institution — McKean

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 30, 2011
C.A. No. 09-122 Erie (W.D. Pa. Mar. 30, 2011)

Opinion

C.A. No. 09-122 Erie.

March 30, 2011


MEMORANDUM ORDER


Plaintiff' Complaint was received by the Clerk of Court on May 29, 2009, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The magistrate judge's report and recommendation ("R R"), filed on March 10, 2011, recommended that the motion to dismiss, or alternatively, for summary judgment, filed by Defendants (Doc. No. 29) be granted.

The parties were allowed fourteen (14) days from the date of service to file objections. No objections were filed. After de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the report and recommendation, we adopt Magistrate Judge Baxter's March 10, 2011 R R as the Opinion of the Court.

AND NOW, this 30th day of March, 2011, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that said report and recommendation (Doc. 34) is adopted as the Opinion of the Court. The motion to dismiss, or, alternatively, for summary judgment, filed by defendants (Doc. 29) is hereby granted. The Clerk of Courts is directed to mark this case CLOSED. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of the defendants.


Summaries of

Dukes v. Federal Correctional Institution — McKean

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 30, 2011
C.A. No. 09-122 Erie (W.D. Pa. Mar. 30, 2011)
Case details for

Dukes v. Federal Correctional Institution — McKean

Case Details

Full title:MARCUS DUKES, Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION — McKEAN, et…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 30, 2011

Citations

C.A. No. 09-122 Erie (W.D. Pa. Mar. 30, 2011)