From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dukes v. Brody

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Jan 30, 2019
No. 3:18-CV-2189-B-BH (N.D. Tex. Jan. 30, 2019)

Opinion

No. 3:18-CV-2189-B-BH

01-30-2019

RICO DUKES, Plaintiff, v. SHANKLIN BRODY, et al., Defendants.


Referred to U.S. Magistrate Judge

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. By separate judgment, the plaintiff's claims will be dismissed without prejudice for improper venue.

SIGNED this 30th day of January, 2019.

/s/ _________

JANE J. BOYLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Dukes v. Brody

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Jan 30, 2019
No. 3:18-CV-2189-B-BH (N.D. Tex. Jan. 30, 2019)
Case details for

Dukes v. Brody

Case Details

Full title:RICO DUKES, Plaintiff, v. SHANKLIN BRODY, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Jan 30, 2019

Citations

No. 3:18-CV-2189-B-BH (N.D. Tex. Jan. 30, 2019)

Citing Cases

Dukes v. Denton Cnty. Court & Jail

The plaintiff has filed twenty two other lawsuits in this district and is well aware of the venue provisions…