Opinion
14-22-00334-CV
08-18-2022
On Appeal from the 334th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2017-11518.
Panel consists of Zimmerer, Spain, and Poissant Justices.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM
Appellant Duke Inc., General Contractors has filed a petition for permissive appeal seeking to challenge an interlocutory order denying its motion for summary judgment. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014(d); Tex. R. App. P. 28.3. To be entitled to a permissive appeal from an interlocutory order that would not otherwise be appealable, the requesting party must establish that (1) the order to be appealed involves a "controlling question of law as to which there is a substantial ground for difference of opinion" and (2) an immediate appeal from the order "may materially advance the ultimate termination of the litigation." Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014(d); see Tex. R. App. P. 28.3(e)(4); Tex.R.Civ.P. 168. Because we conclude that the petition fails to establish each requirement of Rule 28.3(3)(e)(4), we deny the petition for permissive appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 28.3(e)(4).