Opinion
No. 523 CA 23-00714
07-26-2024
THE RUSSELL FRIEDMAN LAW GROUP, LLP, GARDEN CITY (NEIL FLYNN OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT. JOHN P. BRINGEWATT, COUNTY ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (ALISSA M. BRENNAN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
THE RUSSELL FRIEDMAN LAW GROUP, LLP, GARDEN CITY (NEIL FLYNN OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.
JOHN P. BRINGEWATT, COUNTY ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (ALISSA M. BRENNAN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CURRAN, BANNISTER, DELCONTE, AND HANNAH, JJ.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Victoria M. Argento, J.), entered March 23, 2023. The order denied the motion of plaintiff for an order, inter alia, deeming service of the amended and supplemental notice of claim valid or for leave to serve the amended and supplemental notice of claim.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.
Same memorandum as in Duhart-Neal v Monroe County ([appeal No. 2] - A.D.3d - [] [4th Dept 2024]).