From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dugger v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five
Aug 31, 1993
878 S.W.2d 829 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

No. 63871.

August 31, 1993.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT, ST. LOUIS COUNTY; JAMES HARTENBACH, JUDGE.

John Klosterman, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John M. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before GARY M. GAERTNER, C.J., and PUDLOWSKI and SIMON, JJ.


ORDER


Movant, Timothy Dugger, appeals from a dismissal of his Rule 24.035 motion as untimely in the Circuit Court of St. Louis County. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. As we further find an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the motion court's order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties here involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.


Summaries of

Dugger v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five
Aug 31, 1993
878 S.W.2d 829 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

Dugger v. State

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY DUGGER, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five

Date published: Aug 31, 1993

Citations

878 S.W.2d 829 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993)