Opinion
Civil Action 2:19-CV-302
09-07-2021
JARVIS DUGAS, . Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants.
ORDER
DAVID S. MORALES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Jason B. Libby's Memorandum and Recommendation (“M&R”), entered on June 28, 2021. (D.E. 38). The M&R recommends that the Court deny Plaintiffs construed motion for relief from judgment (D.E. 36) under Rule 60(b) for failure to present extraordinary circumstances warranting relief.
The parties were provided proper notice of, and the opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge's M&R. See U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); FEDR. CIV. P. 72(b); General Order No. 2002-13. Plaintiff timely filed objections to the M&R. (D.E. 44). Having carefully reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the M&R, the record, the applicable law, and having made a de novo review of the portions of the M&R to which Plaintiffs objections were directed, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the court OVERRULES Plaintiffs objections. (D.E. 44). Therefore, the Court ADOPTS the M&R in its entirety. (D.E. 38). Accordingly, Plaintiffs motion is DENIED. (D.E. 36).
SO ORDERED.