From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dufour v. Silsby

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Mar 3, 1980
411 A.2d 1391 (Me. 1980)

Opinion

March 3, 1980.

Appeal from the On motion for Rehearing and Reconsideration.

Jolovitz Niehoff, Lester T. Jolovitz, Waterville, for plaintiff.

Silbsby Silsby, Raymond L. Williams, Ellsworth, Weeks, Hutchins, Frye Welch, Roger Welch, Waterville, for defendants.

Before McKUSICK, C.J., and WERNICK, NICHOLS, GODFREY and GLASSMAN, JJ.


On Motion for Rehearing and Reconsideration


The motion for rehearing and reconsideration must be dismissed. Tyson v. Whitaker Son, Inc., Me., 411 A.2d 389 (1980); Ginn v. Penobscot Co., Me., 342 A.2d 270, 275 (1975). We have reviewed the instant case to determine whether it falls within any of the limited exceptions recognized in those cases, and have concluded that it does not. Moreover, there is no occasion for any clarification of this Court's opinion in support of its mandate.

Motion dismissed.


Summaries of

Dufour v. Silsby

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Mar 3, 1980
411 A.2d 1391 (Me. 1980)
Case details for

Dufour v. Silsby

Case Details

Full title:Roger DUFOUR v. William S. SILSBY, Jr. and Norene E. Silsby and Federal…

Court:Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Date published: Mar 3, 1980

Citations

411 A.2d 1391 (Me. 1980)