From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Duffy v. Chemical Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 14, 2000
278 A.D.2d 102 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

December 14, 2000.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Emily Goodman, J.), entered on or about October 12, 1999, which, upon reargument, granted the previously denied motion of third-party defendant Cushman ; Wakefield, Inc. to dismiss the third-party complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Gail L. Ritzert, for third-party Defendant-Respondent.

Before: Rosenberger, J.P., Williams, Tom, Ellerin, Wallach, JJ.


In view of the service agreement between defendant third-party plaintiff building owners and third -party defendant management company requiring third-party plaintiffs to purchase insurance and indemnify third-party defendants with respect to claims such as those asserted by plaintiff in the main action, the third-party action was properly dismissed (see, Santamaria v. 1125 Park Ave. Corp., 238 A.D.2d 259).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Duffy v. Chemical Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 14, 2000
278 A.D.2d 102 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Duffy v. Chemical Bank

Case Details

Full title:RAYMOND J. DUFFY, PLAINTIFF, v. CHEMICAL BANK, ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 14, 2000

Citations

278 A.D.2d 102 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
717 N.Y.S.2d 532