From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DUFF v. SOLANO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 7, 2010
No. CIV S-09-1053 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 7, 2010)

Opinion

No. CIV S-09-1053 LKK GGH P.

December 7, 2010


FINDINGS RECOMMENDATIONS


By order filed October 6, 2010, plaintiff was ordered, inter alia, to show cause, within twenty-eight days, why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that the action be dismissed with prejudice. The twenty-eight day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not shown cause or otherwise responded to the court's order.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed with prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: December 7, 2010


Summaries of

DUFF v. SOLANO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 7, 2010
No. CIV S-09-1053 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 7, 2010)
Case details for

DUFF v. SOLANO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT

Case Details

Full title:JAIMEY L. DUFF, Plaintiff, v. SOLANO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 7, 2010

Citations

No. CIV S-09-1053 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 7, 2010)