DUFF v. APKER

Full title: MICHAEL DUFF, Petitioner v. CRAIG APKER, et al., Respondents

Court: United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jan 27, 2011

Civil Action No. 3:09-cv-672 (M.D. Pa. Jan. 27, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:09-cv-672.

January 27, 2011

ORDER

YVETTE KANE, Chief District Judge

NOW, on this 27^th day of January 2011, upon consideration of Magistrate Judge Martin Carlson's well-reasoned report and recommendation (Doc. No. 28), to which no objections have been filed, ¹ IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the report and recommendation is ADOPTED. The Court will DENY the motion for habeas relief. The clerk of court is directed to close the case.

1 On January 3, 2011, Petitioner's counsel filed an unopposed motion to continue the deadline for filing objections because he was unable to locate his client. (Doc. No. 29.) This Court granted the motion and ordered objections to the report and recommendation be filed by January 18, 2011. (Doc. No. 30.) On January 18, 2011, Petitioner's counsel informed the Court that he was still unable to make contact with his client and thus could not lodge any objections to the report and recommendation. (Doc. No. 31.)