Opinion
CASE NO. CV- 11-03917 DMR
11-02-2011
Freda J. Duff-Brown, et al. Plaintiff(s), v. City and County of San Francisco, Defendant(s).
Dwane W. Reno, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiff Ruth M. Bond. Deputy City Atty. Attorney for Defendant
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
√ Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in c ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need ft ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Process:
Private ADR (please identify process and provider)
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.)
other requested deadline ____
Dwane W. Reno, Esq.
Attorney for Plaintiff
Ruth M. Bond. Deputy City Atty.
Attorney for Defendant
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to:
Non-binding Arbitration
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE)
X Mediation
Private ADR
Deadline for ADR session
X 90 days from the date of this order.
other
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Judge Thelton E. Henderson