From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Duecaster v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio
Sep 29, 2005
Case No. 4:04CV1979 (N.D. Ohio Sep. 29, 2005)

Opinion

Case No. 4:04CV1979.

September 29, 2005


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER


On October 8, 2004, this Court issued an order assigning this case to Magistrate Judge George J. Limbert for general pre-trial supervision (Dkt. #3). On September 14, 2005, Magistrate Judge Limbert issued a Report and Recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Dkt. #10).

FED. R. CIV.P. 72(b) provides that objections to a report and recommendation must be filed within ten (10) days after service, but Plaintiff has failed to timely file any such objections. Therefore, the Court must assume that Plaintiff is satisfied with the Magistrate Judge's recommendation. Any further review by this Court would be a duplicative and an inefficient use of the Court's limited resources. Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d 813 (6th Cir. 1984), aff'd, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); Howard v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 932 F.2d 505 (6th Cir. 1991); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981).

Therefore, the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Limbert (Dkt. #10) is hereby ADOPTED. Accordingly, Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiff's complaint without prejudice is GRANTED and this case is DISMISSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Duecaster v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio
Sep 29, 2005
Case No. 4:04CV1979 (N.D. Ohio Sep. 29, 2005)
Case details for

Duecaster v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority

Case Details

Full title:LAWRENCE DUECASTER, Plaintiff, v. OHIO ADULT PAROLE AUTHORITY, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio

Date published: Sep 29, 2005

Citations

Case No. 4:04CV1979 (N.D. Ohio Sep. 29, 2005)