From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dudsak v. Koester

Superior Court of Delaware
Oct 1, 2024
C. A. N23C-08-135 FJJ (Del. Super. Ct. Oct. 1, 2024)

Opinion

C. A. N23C-08-135 FJJ

10-01-2024

Joanne Dudsak and Kelly Anne Muscle, Plaintiff, v. Christopher Koester, Larissa Jones and New Jersey Manufacturers Ins. Co., Defendants.


ORDER

Francis J. Jones, Jr., Judge.

1. Defendants have moved for summary judgment on the issue of whether plaintiffs may introduce at trial as part to their special damages those amounts paid by New Jersey Manufacturers pursuant to a PIP policy issued in New Jersey covering plaintiffs.

2. In a related Court of Chancery action the Court has just issued a decision in Allstate Insurance Company v. New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance Company vacating a subrogation award in favor of NJM against Allstate the insurance carrier for the defendants in this case.

3. It is well settled Delaware law that an out of state plaintiff is not subject to the evidentiary strictures of 21 Del. C. §2118 (h).

Reed v. Hoffecker, 616 A.2d 835 (Del. 1992).

4. Plaintiffs may introduce special damages even if some of those damages were paid by NJM under the NJM N.J. PIP policy.

5. Defendants' Motion is DENIED.

IT SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Dudsak v. Koester

Superior Court of Delaware
Oct 1, 2024
C. A. N23C-08-135 FJJ (Del. Super. Ct. Oct. 1, 2024)
Case details for

Dudsak v. Koester

Case Details

Full title:Joanne Dudsak and Kelly Anne Muscle, Plaintiff, v. Christopher Koester…

Court:Superior Court of Delaware

Date published: Oct 1, 2024

Citations

C. A. N23C-08-135 FJJ (Del. Super. Ct. Oct. 1, 2024)