Dudley v. Powell Law Office

Full title: CRYSTAL DUDLEY, Plaintiff, v. POWELL LAW OFFICE, P.C. Defendant.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

Date published: Sep 20, 2011

Case No. 3:11-cv-5409-RBL (W.D. Wash. Sep. 20, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 3:11-cv-5409-RBL

09-20-2011

CRYSTAL DUDLEY, Plaintiff, v. POWELL LAW OFFICE, P.C. Defendant.

SIMBURG, KETTER, SHEPPARD & PURDY, LLP Andrew D. Shafer, WSBA No. 9405 ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT

Ronald B. Leignton

Hon. Ronald B. Leighton

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STRIKE OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS

This matter came on for hearing on the defendant's motion to strike plaintiff's opposition to defendant's motion for dismissal. The court has reviewed the pleadings of the parties filed in connection with this motion.

The court finds that plaintiff's opposition brief was filed two days late, causing prejudice to defendant's ability to respond. Accordingly, the court ORDERS as follows [check appropriate box(es)]:

[ ] Plaintiff's opposition brief is STRICKEN;

[ ] Plaintiff is ORDERED to appear before the court on_and show cause why its opposition brief should not be stricken;

[×]Defendant shall have 3additional court days in which to file its reply brief.

Done in open court this 20th day of September, 2011.

Judge Ronald B. Leignton

Presented By:

SIMBURG, KETTER, SHEPPARD & PURDY, LLP

Andrew D. Shafer, WSBA No. 9405

ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT