From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dudley v. Kohler

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 4, 2021
2:17-cv-2308 MCE AC P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 4, 2021)

Opinion

2:17-cv-2308 MCE AC P

06-04-2021

CLYDE A. DUDLEY, II, Plaintiff, v. LORI KOHLER, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On April 28, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 29. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations, ECF No. 30, to which defendant has responded, ECF No. 31.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed April 28, 2021, ECF No. 29, are adopted in full;
2. Defendant's motion to dismiss, ECF No. 23, is GRANTED; and
3. This action is DISMISSED as barred by claim preclusion. IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Dudley v. Kohler

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 4, 2021
2:17-cv-2308 MCE AC P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 4, 2021)
Case details for

Dudley v. Kohler

Case Details

Full title:CLYDE A. DUDLEY, II, Plaintiff, v. LORI KOHLER, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 4, 2021

Citations

2:17-cv-2308 MCE AC P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 4, 2021)