From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ductless Hood Co. v. a B Home Appliances

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
May 14, 1963
317 F.2d 606 (2d Cir. 1963)

Opinion

No. 343, Docket 27940.

Argued May 2, 1963.

Decided May 14, 1963.

Roger T. McLean, of Adams, Forward McLean, New York City (N. Dale Sayre, of Adams, Forward McLean, and Irving Moldauer, New York City, on the brief), for plaintiffs-appellants.

Joseph M. Fitzpatrick, of Ward, Neal, Haselton, Orme McElhannon, New York City (John Thomas Cella and Lewis H. Eslinger, of Ward, Neal, Haselton, Orme McElhannon, New York City, on the brief), for defendant-appellee.

Before CLARK, SMITH and HAYS, Circuit Judges.


In an action for infringement of U.S. Patent 2,886,124, for a "kitchen conditioner," issued to George A. Scharmer on May 12, 1959, the district court sustained the defense of lack of invention over the prior art, specifically the Sonntag patent (U.S. Patent 2,369,375), and dismissed the complaint. The advancement claimed by the plaintiffs for their "invention" is the relocation of air outlets from the top to the front of a kitchen exhaust hood. If the top of the hood is to be covered by cabinets — the situation for which plaintiffs' product was designed — the obvious answer is moving the louvres. This hardly shows invention. Thus we accept the findings of District Judge Dooling and affirm on his persuasive opinion, D.C.E.D.N.Y., 210 F. Supp. 57.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Ductless Hood Co. v. a B Home Appliances

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
May 14, 1963
317 F.2d 606 (2d Cir. 1963)
Case details for

Ductless Hood Co. v. a B Home Appliances

Case Details

Full title:The DUCTLESS HOOD CO., Inc., New Milford Construction and Repair Company…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: May 14, 1963

Citations

317 F.2d 606 (2d Cir. 1963)