From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ducre v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Sep 13, 2000
768 So. 2d 1159 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

Case No. 2D99-4460

Opinion filed September 13, 2000.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Florence Foster, Judge.

Paul A. Ducre, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jon J. Johnson, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


Mr. Ducre appeals an order in this child support collection case requiring him to pay arrearages. Although we find no error and affirm, one of Mr. Ducre's concerns merits a cautionary comment.

Mr. Ducre had two motions scheduled for consideration by a court-appointed hearing officer. He alleges that immediately prior to the hearing the hearing officer was secluded behind closed doors with opposing counsel. While there is no record to support this assertion, we hasten to point out that, as quasi-judicial officers, hearing officers must avoid ex parte meetings with counsel and should avoid even the appearance of improper conduct. Whether appearing before a hearing officer or the court, a litigant should have the same confidence in the impartiality of the fact-finder.

Affirmed.

PATTERSON, C.J., and ALTENBERND, J., Concur.


Summaries of

Ducre v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Sep 13, 2000
768 So. 2d 1159 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Ducre v. State

Case Details

Full title:PAUL A. DUCRE, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Sep 13, 2000

Citations

768 So. 2d 1159 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Citing Cases

State v. Griffin

A litigant is entitled to have confidence that the hearing officer before whom he or she appears is acting…

State, Dept. of Highway v. Griffin

A litigant is entitled to have confidence that the hearing officer before whom he or she appears is acting…