From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ducosin v. Mott

Oregon Court of Appeals
Dec 22, 1980
50 Or. App. 207 (Or. Ct. App. 1980)

Opinion

No. 77-4-184, CA 16290

On respondent's reconsideration filed December 22, 1980, reconsideration allowed, former opinion adhered to ( 49 Or. App. 369, 619 P.2d 678) February 3, reconsideration denied March 12, petition for review allowed May 5, 1981 ( 291 Or. 1) See later issue Oregon Reports

Appeal from Circuit Court, Clackamas County.

Dale Jacobs, Judge.

Robert J. Morgan, Milwaukie, and Emil R. Berg, Portland, for respondent.

Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Thornton and Buttler, Judges.


THORNTON, J.

Reconsideration allowed. Former opinion adhered to.


Plaintiff filed a petition for review alleging, among other things, that we failed to consider the fact that defendant's defamatory statements about plaintiff to the county medical examiner were overheard by defendant's friend, Matilda Zachary, and that this constituted a publication that is not absolutely privileged as we have held defendant's statements to the medical examiner to be. We do not agree with plaintiff's version of the facts.

Defendant testified on deposition that he had called the medical examiner on the phone and that Zachary had overheard the conversation in which he had suggested foul play on plaintiff's part in the death of her mother. Defendant was challenged on this point at trial. He then qualified his earlier testimony as follows:

"There were two phone calls. She overheard the first one. It was made from my phone in Estacada. I was unable to reach Dr. Schilke [the medical examiner]."

Matilda Zachary testified in regard to the first call that "he might have tried to make a phone call, but I don't think he completed it." The second phone call, in which defendant made the alleged defamatory statements, was made from a phone booth, and Zachary testified she heard no part of the conversation. We conclude that no publication was made.

Reconsideration allowed. Former opinion adhered to.


Summaries of

Ducosin v. Mott

Oregon Court of Appeals
Dec 22, 1980
50 Or. App. 207 (Or. Ct. App. 1980)
Case details for

Ducosin v. Mott

Case Details

Full title:DUCOSIN, Respondent, v. MOTT, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Dec 22, 1980

Citations

50 Or. App. 207 (Or. Ct. App. 1980)
622 P.2d 763

Citing Cases

Ducosin v. Mott

On review from Court of Appeals. Appeal from Circuit Court, Clackamas County. Dale Jacobs, Judge. 49 Or. App.…

Summers v. Binns

The difference in terms of proof between absolute privilege and qualified or conditional privilege is that…