From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Duckworth v. Hetzel

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION
Feb 15, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:10cv72-MHT (M.D. Ala. Feb. 15, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:10cv72-MHT

02-15-2012

WILLIAM D. DUCKWORTH, Petitioner, v. GARY HETZEL, Warden, et al. Respondents.


(WO)


JUDGMENT

In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court:

(1) Petitioner's objections (Doc. No. 30) are overruled.
(2) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (Doc. No. 29) is adopted.
(3) The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No. 1) is denied as time-barred.

It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against petitioner, for which execution may issue.

The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

This case is closed.

Myron H. Thompson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Duckworth v. Hetzel

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION
Feb 15, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:10cv72-MHT (M.D. Ala. Feb. 15, 2012)
Case details for

Duckworth v. Hetzel

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM D. DUCKWORTH, Petitioner, v. GARY HETZEL, Warden, et al…

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Feb 15, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:10cv72-MHT (M.D. Ala. Feb. 15, 2012)