From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Duck v. Herb

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Dec 29, 2021
Civil Action 1:21-CV-2112 (M.D. Pa. Dec. 29, 2021)

Opinion

Civil Action 1:21-CV-2112

12-29-2021

RICKEY LYNN DUCK III, Plaintiff v. BETH HERB and CECELIA MADUKA, Defendants


ORDER

Christopher C. Conner, United States District Judge Middle District of Pennsylvania.

AND NOW, this 29th day of December, 2021, upon review of plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and further upon review of the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) and 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, (Doc. 2), is GRANTED.

2. Plaintiff shall pay the full filing fee of $350.00 based on the financial information provided in the application to proceed in forma pauperis. The full filing fee shall be paid regardless of the outcome of the litigation. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1) and (2), the Superintendent/Warden, or other appropriate official at plaintiff's place of confinement, is directed to deduct an initial partial filing fee of 20% or the greater of:

a. The average monthly deposits in the inmate's prison account for the past six months, or
b. The average monthly balance in the inmate's prison account for the past six months.
The initial partial filing fee shall be forwarded to the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, P.O. Box 1148, 235 N. Washington Avenue, Scranton, Pennsylvania, 18501-1148, to be credited to the above-captioned docket number. In
each succeeding month, when the amount in plaintiff's inmate trust fund account exceeds $10.00, the Superintendent/Warden, or other appropriate official, shall forward payments to the Clerk of Court equaling 20% of the preceding month's income credited to plaintiff's inmate trust fund account until the fees are paid. Each payment shall reference the above-captioned docket number.

3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to send a copy of this order to the Superintendent/Warden of the institution where plaintiff is presently confined.

4. Plaintiff's complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice.

5. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint on or before January 29, 2022 to cure the deficiencies identified in the court's memorandum opinion. Any amended complaint filed pursuant to this order shall be filed to the same docket number as the instant action, shall be entitled “Amended Complaint, ” and shall be complete in all respects. It shall be a new pleading that stands by itself as an adequate complaint under the F ederal Rules of Civil Procedure.

6. If plaintiff does not file an amended complaint by the above date, this case will be dismissed with prejudice for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum.


Summaries of

Duck v. Herb

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Dec 29, 2021
Civil Action 1:21-CV-2112 (M.D. Pa. Dec. 29, 2021)
Case details for

Duck v. Herb

Case Details

Full title:RICKEY LYNN DUCK III, Plaintiff v. BETH HERB and CECELIA MADUKA, Defendants

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania

Date published: Dec 29, 2021

Citations

Civil Action 1:21-CV-2112 (M.D. Pa. Dec. 29, 2021)