Dubrin v. Bonilla

Full title: DUBRIN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. BONILLA, et al., Defendants.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 28, 2011

Case No. 1:11-cv-01484 JLT (PC) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 28, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 1:11-cv-01484 JLT (PC)

10-28-2011

DUBRIN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. BONILLA, et al., Defendants.

Jennifer L. Thurston

ORDER FINDING SERVICE OF THE COMPLAINT APPROPRIATE

(Doc. 7)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF THE COURT TO ISSUE SUMMONS

Plaintiffs are state prisoners who are represented by counsel. The Court has screened Plaintiffs' First Amended complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and has found that it states a cognizable Eighth Amendment claim against the Defendants. If the allegations in Plaintiff's complaint incident are proven, Plaintiffs have a reasonable opportunity of prevailing on the merits of the claims.

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Service of Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint is appropriate as to all named Defendants;
2. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to issue a summons in this case to Defendants Bounville, Matthew Cate and Michael Stainer.
3. Once the summons is received, Plaintiffs SHALL immediately initiate service pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Jennifer L. Thurston

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE