From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DuBose v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Sep 26, 1991
585 So. 2d 1198 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

No. 90-3665.

September 26, 1991.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County; Lacey A. Collier, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Laura Rush, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.


Varick F. DuBose has appealed his sentencing as an habitual felony offender. We affirm, but as conceded by the state, must remand for correction of the written sentencing order, on which the trial judge erroneously marked the habitual offender section for DuBose's misdemeanor convictions. Upon remand, the sentencing order for Counts II, III and V must be corrected to reflect that the special sentencing provision for habitual offender status does not apply to these misdemeanor offenses. See Peterson v. State, 576 So.2d 1385 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991).

JOANOS, C.J., and SMITH and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

DuBose v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Sep 26, 1991
585 So. 2d 1198 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

DuBose v. State

Case Details

Full title:VARICK F. DuBOSE, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Sep 26, 1991

Citations

585 So. 2d 1198 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Citing Cases

Teasley v. State

In count four of case number 90-5483, which was a misdemeanor charge, the court erred in designating Teasley…

Powell v. State

We must, therefore, remand this case to the trial court with instructions to delete the habitual offender…