Opinion
20 CIVIL 8422 (BCM)
03-22-2022
JUDGMENT
It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated March 21, 2022, because the ALJ properly considered plaintiff's non-severe mental health impairments in his determination of her RFC, and appropriately evaluated the medical opinions of Drs. Murphy and Momot-Baker, and because the RFC formulated by the ALJ was supported by substantial evidence in the record, plaintiff's motion is DENIED, the Commissioner's motion is GRANTED, and this action is DISMISSED.