Dubois v. Armstrong

Full title: Tammy DUBOIS, et ux v. Gordon ARMSTRONG, et al. Tommy Dubois, et ux v…

Court: Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

Date published: Feb 10, 2016

184 So. 3d 288 (La. Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

No. 15–346.

02-10-2016

Tammy DUBOIS, et ux v. Gordon ARMSTRONG, et al. Tommy Dubois, et ux v. Gordon Armstrong, et al.

Robert A. Mahtook, Jr., Mahtook & LaFleur, L.L.C., Lafayette, LA, for Defendants/Appellees—Scottsdale Insurance Company and SMI Group, Inc.   D. Patrick Daniel, Jr., The Daniel Law Firm, Houston, TX, for Plaintiffs/Appellants—Tommy Dubois and Tammy Dubois.

THIBODEAUX, Chief Judge.

Robert A. Mahtook, Jr., Mahtook & LaFleur, L.L.C., Lafayette, LA, for Defendants/Appellees—Scottsdale Insurance Company and SMI Group, Inc.

D. Patrick Daniel, Jr., The Daniel Law Firm, Houston, TX, for Plaintiffs/Appellants—Tommy Dubois and Tammy Dubois.

Opinion

THIBODEAUX, Chief Judge.

[ 1] For the reasons discussed in the consolidated case of Tommy Dubois v. Gordon Armstrong, et al., 15–345 (La.App. 3 Cir. 2/10/16), 184 So.3d 288, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed in all respects. Costs are assessed to the plaintiff, Tammy Dubois.

AFFIRMED.