From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DUBESHTER v. OKUN

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1921
196 App. Div. 974 (N.Y. App. Div. 1921)

Opinion

May, 1921.


Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. It appears on the face of the affidavits that whether the trial takes place in Sullivan county or Kings county, the convenience of witnesses will be about equal on each side. In such circumstances a safe rule to follow is that the trial should take place in the county where the cause of action arose. Although this latter consideration is not controlling, it should be given effect when there is no other controlling reason to determine the place of trial. ( Adriance, Platt Co. v. Coon, 15 App. Div. 92; Kubiac v. Clement, 35 id. 186; Seafir v. Shutts, 190 id. 518; Rogers v. Beaver Co., Id. 815.) Blackmar, P.J., Mills, Putnam, Kelly and Jaycox, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

DUBESHTER v. OKUN

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1921
196 App. Div. 974 (N.Y. App. Div. 1921)
Case details for

DUBESHTER v. OKUN

Case Details

Full title:SUSAN DUBESHTER, Respondent, v. SAMUEL OKUN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 1, 1921

Citations

196 App. Div. 974 (N.Y. App. Div. 1921)