Opinion
April, 1929.
Judgment reversed upon the law and new trial granted, costs to abide the event. The court committed error in ruling upon the evidence at folios 109, 122, 163. One ruling (Fol. 109) resulted in injecting into the case irrelevant prejudicial matter which aggravated the effect of counsel's statements of like character in the opening (Fol. 35). Lazansky, P.J., Rich, Kapper, Carswell and Scudder, JJ., concur.