From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Duarte v. Williams

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Oct 26, 2012
2:12-cv-01305-JCM-PAL (D. Nev. Oct. 26, 2012)

Opinion

2:12-cv-01305-JCM-PAL

10-26-2012

PEDRO R. DUARTE, Petitioner, v. BRIAN WILLIAMS, Respondent.


ORDER

Petitioner Pedro Duarte filed a motion for enlargement of time to file his amended petition (ECF No. 1), seeking an additional 90 days time. This action was commenced in July and several months have already expired without significant progress being made. However, because the court appreciates the difficulties often encountered by prisoners in their efforts to conduct their legal proceedings, the amount of time petitioner seeks shall be granted. Petitioner is advised, however, that no further extensions will be granted for this purpose.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the motion for enlargement of time to file the amended petition (ECF No. 15) is GRANTED. The amended petition shall be filed and served upon respondents no later than January 16, 2013. Thereafter, respondents shall have thirty days to file their answer or other response to the amended petition.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that successive motions to dismiss will not be entertained. If an answer is filed, respondents shall comply with the requirements of Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Proceedings in the United States District Courts under 28 U.S.C. §2254. If an answer is filed, petitioner shall have forty-five (45) days from the date of service of the answer to file a reply.

_________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Duarte v. Williams

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Oct 26, 2012
2:12-cv-01305-JCM-PAL (D. Nev. Oct. 26, 2012)
Case details for

Duarte v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:PEDRO R. DUARTE, Petitioner, v. BRIAN WILLIAMS, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Oct 26, 2012

Citations

2:12-cv-01305-JCM-PAL (D. Nev. Oct. 26, 2012)