From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Drysdale v. Evanac

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 6, 2000
277 A.D.2d 199 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Submitted October 11, 2000.

November 6, 2000.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rappaport, J.), dated June 30, 1999, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d).

Cheven, Keely Hatzis, New York, N.Y. (Thomas Torto of counsel), for appellant.

Before: GUY JAMES MANGANO, P.J., SONDRA MILLER, LEO F. McGINITY, DANIEL F. LUCIANO, NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The plaintiff raised a triable issue of fact (see, CPLR 3212[b]) as to whether he sustained a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d).


Summaries of

Drysdale v. Evanac

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 6, 2000
277 A.D.2d 199 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Drysdale v. Evanac

Case Details

Full title:PATRICK DRYSDALE, RESPONDENT, v. FRANCIS B. EVANAC, APPELLANT

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 6, 2000

Citations

277 A.D.2d 199 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
715 N.Y.S.2d 656