From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dryden v. McDowell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Nov 8, 2016
2:13-cv-00973-JAD-CWH (D. Nev. Nov. 8, 2016)

Opinion

2:13-cv-00973-JAD-CWH

11-08-2016

Jeffrey L. Dryden, Plaintiff v. Tad R. McDowell, Defendant


Order Adopting Report and Recommendation and Dismissing and Closing Case

[ECF No. 10]

Magistrate Judge Bill Hoffman entered a report recommending that I dismiss this case without prejudice due to pro se plaintiff Jeffrey L. Dryden's apparent lack of interest in pursuing it.

ECF No. 10.

"[N]o review is required of a magistrate judge's report and recommendation unless objections are filed." Objections to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation were due by November 3, 2016, and Dryden has not filed an objection or requested an extension to do so. Accordingly,

Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). --------

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the magistrate judge's report and recommendation [ECF No. 10] is ADOPTED, and this case is DISMISSED without prejudice.

The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE THIS CASE.

Dated this 8th day of November, 2016.

/s/_________

Jennifer A. Dorsey

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Dryden v. McDowell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Nov 8, 2016
2:13-cv-00973-JAD-CWH (D. Nev. Nov. 8, 2016)
Case details for

Dryden v. McDowell

Case Details

Full title:Jeffrey L. Dryden, Plaintiff v. Tad R. McDowell, Defendant

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Nov 8, 2016

Citations

2:13-cv-00973-JAD-CWH (D. Nev. Nov. 8, 2016)