From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Drumm v. Valdez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Jan 6, 2020
Civil Action No. 3:16-CV-3482-M-BH (N.D. Tex. Jan. 6, 2020)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:16-CV-3482-M-BH

01-06-2020

LOGAN M. DRUMM, ID # 2032303, Plaintiff, v. SHERIFF LUPE VALDEZ, et al., Defendants.


Referred to U.S. Magistrate Judge

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and conducting a de novo review of those parts of the Findings and Conclusions to which objections have been made, I am of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court.

It is therefore ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge are accepted. Accordingly, all claims against all defendants, except for the excessive force claims against Valero, Weeks, Mosely, Haggerman, Bailey, and Benson, and the failure to intervene claims against Gibbons, Sanders, Valero, Bailey, and Benson, are dismissed. The Court will enter a separate judgment formally dismissing all claims against Sheriff Lupe Valdez, Sgt. Stockton, CO Moreno, Nurse Brent, the nurse's unnamed supervisor, and the nurse's unnamed employer.

SIGNED this 6th day of January, 2020.

/s/ _________

BARBARA M. G. LYNN

CHIEF JUDGE


Summaries of

Drumm v. Valdez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Jan 6, 2020
Civil Action No. 3:16-CV-3482-M-BH (N.D. Tex. Jan. 6, 2020)
Case details for

Drumm v. Valdez

Case Details

Full title:LOGAN M. DRUMM, ID # 2032303, Plaintiff, v. SHERIFF LUPE VALDEZ, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Jan 6, 2020

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:16-CV-3482-M-BH (N.D. Tex. Jan. 6, 2020)

Citing Cases

Hudler v. McAfee

(stating that there is no authority to support applying bystander liability to a school principal), R. & R.…