Opinion
CIVIL 08-2126 (JRS/AMD)
07-28-2021
VICTORIA DRUDING, et al., Plaintiff-Relators, v. CARE ALTERNATIVES, INC., Defendant.
ORDER
ANN MARIE DONIO, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
This matter having come before the Court by way of “Notice of Intent to Request Redaction” [D.I. 244] (hereinafter, “Notice”) filed by Defendant, Care Alternatives, Inc.; and the Court noting that Defendant requests in its Notice “that there be no public filing of the transcript without the redaction of the individual's name identified on [page] 45, line 11, and page 46, line 8 of the Transcript” (Notice of Intent to Request Redaction [D.I. 244], p. 2); and the Court further noting that Defendant subsequently filed a formal motion [D.I. 245] to seal pursuant to Local Civil Rule 5.3 with respect to the same information at issue in the Notice; and it therefore appearing that Defendant's Notice is moot in light of the subsequent filing of the motion to seal; and the Court having decided this matter pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b); and for good cause shown:
IT IS on this 28th day of July 2021,
ORDERED that Defendant's Notice of Intent to Request Redaction [D.I. 244] shall be, and is hereby, DISMISSED as moot.
Hon. Juan R. Sánchez, U.S. Chief District Judge.