From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Druckman v. Forsyth Furniture Lines

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jan 10, 1928
23 F.2d 493 (4th Cir. 1928)

Opinion

No. 2629.

January 10, 1928.

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of North Carolina; Edwin Y. Webb, Judge.

On petition for rehearing. Petition denied.

For former opinion, see 22 F.2d 59.

David L. Podell, of New York City, and F.P. Hobgood, Jr., and Sidney S. Alderman, both of Greensboro, N.C., for plaintiff in error.

J.H. Clement and Fred S. Hutchins, both of Winston-Salem, N.C., for defendant in error.

Before PARKER and NORTHCOTT, Circuit Judges, and ERNEST F. COCHRAN, District Judge.


The plaintiff in error has presented a petition for rehearing, on the ground that the court overlooked the assignment of error which alleged error in the trial court in declining to grant his motion to set aside the verdict and judgment, and grant a new trial, by reason of his alleged illness and unavoidable absence. The point was not overlooked, but was fully discussed in the opinion in connection with the refusal of the trial court to grant a continuance. The granting or refusal of the motion for continuance was in the discretion of the trial court. The granting or refusal of the motion for new trial, was likewise in the discretion of the trial court; and no useful purpose could have been subserved by further discussion.

Petition for rehearing denied.


Summaries of

Druckman v. Forsyth Furniture Lines

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jan 10, 1928
23 F.2d 493 (4th Cir. 1928)
Case details for

Druckman v. Forsyth Furniture Lines

Case Details

Full title:DRUCKMAN v. FORSYTH FURNITURE LINES, Inc

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jan 10, 1928

Citations

23 F.2d 493 (4th Cir. 1928)