From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Drs. Howarth Scott, P.A. v. Edwards

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Dec 13, 1977
353 So. 2d 175 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

Opinion

No. 77-2244.

December 13, 1977.

Charles W. Abbott of Maguire, Voorhis Wells, P.A., Orlando, for petitioners-relators.


ON SUGGESTION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION

The circuit judge sitting as a judicial referee in a medical mediation panel refused to grant Petitioners' Motion for Summary Judgment. He declared he had no authority to grant a summary judgment. He is right. See, for example, Floyd v. Goss, 352 So.2d 1189 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977). Although it is not determinative of this case we note that Writ of Prohibition is not the proper remedy. Certainly medical mediation panels are the only forums to hear these medical mediation claims under Section 768.44, Florida Statutes (1975). They have jurisdiction. If Petitioners are correct that the Statute of Limitations ran before the claim was filed then that is a matter of affirmative defense for the trial court, not the panel or any member thereof, to decide.

Suggestion for Writ of Prohibition is DENIED.

CROSS and LETTS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Drs. Howarth Scott, P.A. v. Edwards

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Dec 13, 1977
353 So. 2d 175 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)
Case details for

Drs. Howarth Scott, P.A. v. Edwards

Case Details

Full title:DRS. HOWARTH SCOTT, P.A., A MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION, AND DR…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Dec 13, 1977

Citations

353 So. 2d 175 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

Citing Cases

Mott v. Fort Pierce Memorial Hospital

This court has previously decided several cases which make it clear that appellant's second point is without…

McMahon v. Glixman

The intermediate appellate court in Florida has also concluded that the question whether the statute of…