From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Droplets, Inc. v. Matal

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Oct 11, 2017
2016-2140 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 11, 2017)

Opinion

2016-2140

10-11-2017

DROPLETS, INC., Appellant v. JOSEPH MATAL, PERFORMING THE FUNCTIONS AND DUTIES OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR, U.S. PATENT & TRADEMARK OFFICE, Intervenor

DANIEL LUKE GEYSER, Stris & Maher LLP, Los Angeles, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by TIMOTHY BECHEN, Bechen PLLC, Richmond, VA. NATHAN K. KELLEY, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, MONICA BARNES LATEEF, PHILIP J. WARRICK.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 95/002,330.

JUDGMENT

DANIEL LUKE GEYSER, Stris & Maher LLP, Los Angeles, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by TIMOTHY BECHEN, Bechen PLLC, Richmond, VA. NATHAN K. KELLEY, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, MONICA BARNES LATEEF, PHILIP J. WARRICK. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (DYK, REYNA, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT October 11, 2017

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Droplets, Inc. v. Matal

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Oct 11, 2017
2016-2140 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 11, 2017)
Case details for

Droplets, Inc. v. Matal

Case Details

Full title:DROPLETS, INC., Appellant v. JOSEPH MATAL, PERFORMING THE FUNCTIONS AND…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Oct 11, 2017

Citations

2016-2140 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 11, 2017)