Opinion
2016-2140
10-11-2017
DANIEL LUKE GEYSER, Stris & Maher LLP, Los Angeles, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by TIMOTHY BECHEN, Bechen PLLC, Richmond, VA. NATHAN K. KELLEY, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, MONICA BARNES LATEEF, PHILIP J. WARRICK.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 95/002,330.
JUDGMENT
DANIEL LUKE GEYSER, Stris & Maher LLP, Los Angeles, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by TIMOTHY BECHEN, Bechen PLLC, Richmond, VA. NATHAN K. KELLEY, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, MONICA BARNES LATEEF, PHILIP J. WARRICK. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (DYK, REYNA, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT October 11, 2017
Date
/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court