From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dronca v. Fla. Unemp. Appeals Com'n

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Dec 30, 2004
889 So. 2d 1011 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

Opinion

No. 1D03-3694.

December 30, 2004.

An appeal from an order of the Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission.

Karol K. Williams, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant.

Appellant, pro se.

Geri Atkinson-Hazelton, General Counsel, and John D. Maher, Deputy General Counsel, Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


We reverse the decision of the Unemployment Appeals Commission, which concluded that the claimant was disqualified from receiving benefits under sections 443.036(29) and 443.101(1)(a)2., Florida Statutes (2003). The record shows that the claimant's conduct was a single incident of poor judgment, which justified the employer's termination of the claimant's employment, but did not amount to misconduct sufficient to deny the claimant benefits. See Powell v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 886 So.2d 420 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004); McCarty v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 878 So.2d 432, 435 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004); Ash v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 872 So.2d 400 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004).

REVERSED and REMANDED with directions to award claimant unemployment compensation benefits.

ERVIN, PADOVANO and LEWIS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Dronca v. Fla. Unemp. Appeals Com'n

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Dec 30, 2004
889 So. 2d 1011 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)
Case details for

Dronca v. Fla. Unemp. Appeals Com'n

Case Details

Full title:Serban T. DRONCA, Appellant, v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Dec 30, 2004

Citations

889 So. 2d 1011 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)